While the kinds of student outcomes discussed thus far are perhaps the most important
means of assessing the state of primary and secondary education, valuable perspectives
on the state of the humanities can also be gained from looking at the characteristics
of those who teach such courses. Indeed, because standardized exams taken by students
can measure only a limited set of acquired skills and because data on their course-taking
give no indication of the quality of courses taken, one must look at rough measures
of teacher qualifications and satisfaction to get a fuller picture of students’
experiences in humanities classrooms.
Beyond what teacher-focused indicators indicate about the quality of students’ early
educational experiences in the humanities, such indicators are also important in
and of themselves: primary- and secondary-school teachers are professionals whose
qualifications, livelihoods, and feelings of job satisfaction are integral to the
humanities infrastructure. Without capable and engaged humanities educators, the
future of the humanities in the United States is in jeopardy.
This section looks first at teacher backgrounds and qualifications, examining how
prepared teachers in the humanities are to teach their subjects. The focus then
turns to the distribution of faculty across subject areas and, further, to the demographic
characteristics of humanities teachers. Finally, trends in teacher salaries and
satisfaction levels are described.
|
Indicator I-9
|
Qualifications of Humanities Teachers
|
|
|
|
Updated (12/11/09) with data from the 2003-4 Schools & Staffing Survey (National
Center for Education Statistics). Trend line for the percentage of high school students
instructed by a teacher with a postsecondary degree in the subject s/he teaches
has been extended back to 1988.
|
|
An important measure of the condition of humanities education at the precollege
level is the preparedness of teachers who teach humanities classes. Such preparedness
can be partly assessed through information provided by the
National Center for Education Statistics'
(NCES)
Schools and Staffing Survey
(SASS), which asks a sample of public school teachers about the fields in which
they have received teaching certificates, as well as their undergraduate and graduate
majors. Of course, teacher certification and subject-area education do not ensure
quality teaching. Some gifted teachers have not obtained certification, and subject-matter
specialization is no guarantee of effectiveness in the classroom. However, certification
and education are two factors that research suggests have at least some bearing
on student outcomes.1 They are also central to the public policy debate about teaching.
The data presented here describing humanities teacher qualifications are limited
in two respects. For 2003–2004, the most recent academic year for which SASS results
are publicly accessible, data for both measures are available for high school-level
teachers only. Due to the fact that middle school encompasses different grades in
different states, NCES did not produce estimates of teacher qualifications for teachers
at this level. Additionally, an improvement made in 2003–2004 in the way NCES collects
data on teacher certification means that data for this academic year are not comparable
with those collected in previous years.2 Thus, the trend analysis presented here for both high school and middle school teachers
focuses exclusively on their educational backgrounds.
According to SASS data, public high school students in French classes were likeliest
among those taking humanities courses to be exposed to a teacher who was both certified
and possessed a degree in the subject matter being taught. In 2003–2004, 75% of
all high school students taking French were taught by such a teacher (Figure I-9a).
For the other languages the proportion ranged from 60% to approximately 70%, with
English in the lead at 70.4%, a rate similar to those for the natural sciences (69.8%)
and mathematics (65%). In the case of history, however, the rate was markedly lower.
Although greater than 65% of students were taught by history teachers with degrees
in the subject, low certification rates among history teachers meant that only 26.5%
of history students found themselves in classes led by teachers meeting both preparedness
criteria.
As Figure I-9b reveals, the most striking gains between 1988 and 2004 in
exposure of high school students to degreed teachers have been achieved in history.
Having remained in the 40—50% range for over a decade, the percentage of students
taught history by someone with a degree in the subject jumped more than 20 percentage
points between 2000 and 2004. A similarly sharp rise occurred in the level of student
exposure to degreed instructors in the modern languages (other than English), although
changes in the way NCES reports the qualifications of teachers of foreign languages
makes gauging the precise magnitude of the increase difficult. The percentage of
high schoolers learning English language and literature from an individual with
a postsecondary degree in the subject increased steadily, if more incrementally,
rising from 70% in 1988 to 83% in 2004, a trend similar to that observed in the
natural sciences.
The most recent middle school data available from NCES, those for the 1999–2000
school year, reveal that in every subject besides arts and music the percentage
of middle school students taught by degreed teachers was substantially smaller than
the percentage of high schoolers taught by such teachers (Figure I-9c). This
disparity has existed since data on teacher qualifications were first collected
as part of the SASS in 1988. Despite this persistent gap, notably different trends
were observed among middle school humanities subjects. The proportion of middle
school students taught English by a degreed teacher rose modestly over the last
decade of the 20th century, from 41% to 46%, a net increase that mirrored, as at
the high school level, developments in the natural sciences. In contrast, the percentage
of middle schoolers taught history by a degreed teacher declined by roughly the
same increment, so that by 1999–2000, 31% of middle schoolers were learning history
from a teacher with an academic background in the subject, a percentage similar
to that for mathematics. In the most striking development at the middle school level
during this time period, the percentage of students exposed to degreed foreign language
teachers jumped 17 percentage points between 1991 and 1994, only to fall by a nearly
identical amount over the next six years.
Notes
1 For a succinct
review of the most recent literature, see Beth A. Morton et al.,
Education and Certification Qualifications of Departmentalized Public High School-Level Teachers of Core Subjects: Evidence from the 2003–04 Schools and Staffing Survey,
Statistical Analysis Report NCES 2008-338 (Washington, DC: NCES, 2008), 5–7.
2
“The structure of the items concerning certification was revised in the 2003–2004 questionnaire. In 1999–2000, respondents reported whether or not they were certified in their main teaching assignment . . . . This method relied on teachers’ self-reports of the match between their main assignment (and other assignments) and their certification(s) held. There was evidence that allowing teachers to self-report their certification status led to the over-reporting of in-field certifications. As a result, the certification items were changed on the 2003–2004 Teacher Questionnaire. In an effort to improve the reliability of the items, separate questions were used to ask about main teaching assignment and certification. Respondents were first asked to identify the subject code for their main assignment and then, in a later section of the survey, to identify subject codes for all subjects covered by the certification(s) they held. A determination of whether or not teachers were certified in their main assignment is up to the analyst; the analyst is able to match the course taught with certification areas, rather than rely on teacher self-reports.” Morton et al., Education and Certification Qualifications, 57–58.
|
Indicator I-10
|
Demographic Characteristics
|
|
|
The SASS provides a demographic snapshot of the nation's primary- and secondary-school
teachers. These data reveal some continuites but also some striking discontinuities
between the humanities and other subject areas with respect to the age, gender,
and ethnic composition of primary- and secondary-school faculties.
In the 1999–2000 school year, the primary and secondary humanities faculty included
a greater proportion of the oldest teachers than the faculty of any other subject
(34% were aged 50 or older; Figure I-10a). Like teachers in the arts, math,
and science, the majority of humanities teachers in 1999–2000 were female (Figure-I-10b).
However, the disparity between the numbers of female and male teachers was more
pronounced in the humanities than in math or science, the latter having been the
most gender balanced of the primary and secondary faculties. With a teaching force
that was 70% female, the gender distribution of humanities teachers was similar
to that of arts teachers (these include teachers of studio art, dance, drama, and
music). The particularly large percentage of the “all subjects” category who were
women stems from the inclusion in the survey of preschool, kindergarten, and general
education elementary teachers, who were overwhelmingly female.
Due, in large measure, to the greater representation of Hispanics among primary-
and secondary-school humanities teachers, the proportion of humanities posts held
by members of ethnic minorities was greater than that of other disciplines (Figure
I-10c). At the same time, though, the humanities faculty was much less ethnically
diverse than the student population. Students were more than twice as likely as
their teachers to be African American and over three times more likely to be Asian.
Although, as mentioned above, humanities teachers were considerably more likely
to be Hispanic than their counterparts in the arts, math, or science, the proportion
of Hispanic humanities teachers (7.2%) was small relative to the percentage of American
school children of Hispanic descent (13.4%).
|
Indicator I-11
|
Humanities Teachers’ Salaries & Job Satisfaction
|
|
|
Primary- and secondary-school teacher salaries in the humanities are one indicator
of the value placed on humanities education (for faculty salaries at the postsecondary
level, see Indicator III-14,
Faculty Earnings). Because teaching salaries are tied closely to seniority,
earnings data from the SASS are presented here by the career stage of respondents.
For the 1999–2000 academic year, the overwhelming majority
(83%) of early career teachers (0–5 years in teaching) made $35,000 or less ($42,000
or less in 2007 dollars; Figure I-11a).1
By midcareer (10–15 years of service), 59% of teachers were making more than $35,000.
Among the most seasoned teachers, or those with 25 or more years of service, 88%
had crossed the $35,000 threshold, and over 60% were making in excess of $45,000
(or $54,000 in 2007 dollars).
Although U.S. teaching salaries are not overly generous, more than 40% of teachers
of English/language arts, social studies (mostly history), and foreign languages
indicated that if they “could go back to [their] college days and start over again,”
they would certainly become teachers (Figure I-11b). This level of satisfaction
was somewhat higher than that expressed by math and science teachers, 35% of whom
indicated the same kind of enthusiasm for their teaching careers.
Note
1 Census 2000 “long-form” data indicate that national median earnings
(for full-time, year round employees) were $33,000 in calendar year 1999. See Daniel
H. Weinberg, “Evidence from Census 2000 about Earnings by Detailed Occupation for
Men and Women,” Census 2000 Special Reports, no. 15, May 2004. Available online
at
http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/censr-15.pdf.
|