|
Indicator IV-9
|
Revenues of Not-For-Profit Humanities Organizations
|
|
NOTE TO READERS: Please include the following reference when citing data from this page:
"American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Humanities Indicators, http://HumanitiesIndicators.org".
|
|
Indicator IV-9
|
Revenues of Not-For-Profit Humanities Organizations
|
|
|
See the
Note on the Definition of Not-for-Profit Organizations and the
Note on the Definition of Humanities Organizations.
Whereas Indicator IV-8, Foundation Funding,
deals with foundations that give at least a portion of their monies for humanities activities, this indicator focuses on the many
other private, not-for-profit entities that together with such foundations constitute the humanities not-for-profit sector in the
United States. Using funding from either governmental or private sources (usually both) either to engage in or to promote humanistic
endeavors, these organizations are extremely diverse in both their focus and size, ranging from New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art
to the nation’s 56 state humanities councils. (For amore detailed revenue data for the councils, see Indicator IV-3,
State Humanities Council Revenues.) They also include
many small “friends of” associations, such as those that help libraries around the country maintain their collections or that provide
summer reading programs for neighborhood children.
The data presented here were compiled by the Urban Institute’s
National Center for Charitable Statistics (NCCS) from the IRS’s Form 990
Return Transaction Files. Form 990, which must be completed annually by every tax-exempt public charity with revenues normally in
excess of $25,000, describes these organizations’ financial condition, activities, and key personnel. In analyzing this information,
the NCCS employs the National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities (NTEE), a widely used
categorization scheme developed by NCCS, to distinguish among the various kinds of organizations on the basis of their primary mission.
While the NTEE includes a category for the humanities, other types of organizations that the Humanities Indicators consider to fall
within this category, such as museums and libraries, are classified separately within the NTEE. At the request of
the Humanities Indicators’ data analysis team, the NCCS assembled information on all tax-exempt humanities organizations that fall
within the Humanities Indicators’ purview at five-year intervals going back as many years as the NCCS database permitted. This yielded
data for a 15-year period extending from 1989 to 2004.
(For an inventory of the kinds of institutions and groups considered "humanities
organizations" for the purposes of this indicator, and examples of the types of
organizations included in each of the broad categories of humanities organizations
described below, see the
Note on the Definition of Humanities Organizations;
the humanities not-for-profit sector as defined here does not include private not-for-profit
educational programs or institutions.)
The Humanities Indicators’ preliminary analysis of these data, which is presented here, focused on the number and revenues of these
organizations, the characteristics of major organizational subsectors (e.g., historical organizations or libraries), and the
distribution of revenue dollars among these subsectors. Any subsequent editions of the Indicators will delve further into the
data to investigate the human resources of these organizations, as well as their sources of funding.
The preliminary analysis found that between 1989 and 2004, both the number of not-for-profit humanities organizations and their
total revenues grew substantially (Figure IV-9a), with most of the growth taking place between 1994 and 1999. During that five-year period,
the number of humanities organizations increased by 44%, while the increase in reported revenues was approximately 60%. The picture
for the entire 15-year period, however, is different: the number of organizations grew faster, more than doubling between 1989 and 2004.
The fact that the number of organizations grew more quickly than their resources is evident from the decrease
in their typical1 revenues over the time period (Figure IV-9b). In 1989, humanities organizations
typically reported revenues ranging from $78,000 to $443,000, with median revenues amounting to $163,000. By 2004, humanities
organizations typically reported revenues ranging from $42,000 to $264,000, with median revenues of $88,000. Thus by the end of the 15-year period, the universe
of humanities not-for-profits was much larger, but populated by more modestly financed organizations. (Had data on the many small
humanities organizations with revenues less than $25,000 been available, the median revenue level for the entire period would have
been even lower.)
As Figure IV-9b also demonstrates, there was a considerable range in the amount of revenue reported by individual humanities
organizations. In 2004, the minimum revenue was a deficit of over $5 million, while the maximum revenue was in excess of $300 million
(the figure is not to scale with respect to the minimum and maximum revenues). But throughout the period, the vast majority of
not-for-profit humanities organizations—90%—reported revenues that were hundreds of millions of dollars lower than the maximum.
In each year, a handful of organizations, mostly large
museums,2 had budgets that
dwarfed those of all other humanities organizations. This can be seen in Figure IV-9c,
which demonstrates the large share of revenues commanded by museums in 2004.
Although they represented only 20% of humanities organizations, museums had close to
half of all revenues (for more details on the numbers and revenues of museums from 1989
to 2004, see Figure IV-9d). The inverse was true of historical
organizations,3 which
amounted to 36% of all humanities organizations but garnered only 18% of all revenues
(see also Figure IV-9e; these data do not include the substantial number of museums and
historical institutions that are not private not-for-profit organizations but are instead
operated by the government and by colleges and universities). Ethnic and cultural
awareness organizations (profiled in Figure IV-9f) were similar to historical ones, having
a revenue share that was less than half of their share of the total number of humanities
organizations. Organizational counts and revenue totals, as well as detailed information
on 2004 revenues, for the other types of humanities organizations are provided in Figure
IV-9g (Humanities and Arts Councils), Figure IV-9h (Reading Promotion
Organizations), Figure IV-9i (Library Organizations), and Figure IV-9j (other humanities
organizations).
Notes
1
The range of “typical” or “usual” values exhibited by a population of persons or objects is described through the use of a
statistic referred to as the interquartile range, which is designed to exclude the most extreme values of a sample distribution.
Quartiles are statistics that divide the observations of a numeric sample into several groups, each of which contains 25% of the
data. The lower, middle, and upper quartiles are computed by ordering the values for a particular variable (in this case
organizational revenues) from smallest to largest and then finding the values below which fall 25%, 50%, and 75% of the data.
The lower quartile and the upper quartile are the two values that define the interquartile range. The middle quartile is also
known as the median. Figure IV-9b presents both the median and the interquartile range for humanities organization revenues at five-year
intervals from 1989 to 2004.
2
For the purposes of the Humanities Indicators, the term "museum" includes: art
museums, history museums, ethnic heritage museums, multidisciplinary museums, the
support organizations for the museums previously listed, and museum associations. (See the
Note on the Definition of Humanities Organizations.)
3
For the purposes of the Humanities Indicators, the term "historical organization"
includes: historical societies, historical preservation groups, the support organizations for
historical societies and historical preservation groups, professional societies and
associations, and other organizations with a historical focus. (See the
Note on the Definition of Humanities Organizations.)
Note on the Definition of Not-for-Profit Organizations
“Not-for-profit” organization, as the term is used by the Humanities Indicators, refers to entities that are classified
as tax-exempt public charities by the Internal Revenue Service. Public charities are a subset of 501(c)(3)
organizations (tax-exempt entities) that meet additional criteria specified in Section 509(a) of the tax code. This
section specifies two types of public charities: Section 509(a)(1) organizations, which are not-for-profit organizations
that receive their public support primarily from gifts, grants, and contributions from a broad group of people; and
Section 509(a)(2) organizations, which obtain their revenues from these sources, as well as in the form of fees for
their services.
Back to Content
|
|